Toxic Metal Nano “Contaminants” in Shots And Adverse Effect Correlation

Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD - Sep 11, 2022 ∙ Paid ∙ Source

Likes: 45 | Comments: 9 | Reposts: 0 | ALL OTHER POSTS

I have written extensively about the worldwide findings of metallic nanoparticles that have been found in C19 injectables as well as in live blood analysis of those who accepted the shots.

These findings metal nanostructures are most concerning to me as a physician. These findings to me are reason enough to stop the shots. The correlation to find the toxic poisonous particles in the shots and then correlate this with the live blood analysis in C19 injected individuals who have metal nanoparticles in their blood is equally concerning.

Even more worrisome is that it has long been known that these kinds of metals have been found in every “vaccine” of every company and have been undisclosed. No doctor ever has given informed consent about these toxic components anywhere in the world.

This important analysis was published in International Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination in 2017

New quality-control investigations on vaccines: micro- and nanocontamination

The Authors write:

Electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible . 44 types of vaccines coming from 2 countries (Italy and France) were analyzed.

Results:

The investigations verified the physical-chemical composition of the vaccines considered according to the inorganic component as declared by the Producer. In detail, we verified the presence of saline and Aluminum salts, but further presence of micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases, whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product.

Sample Metals found:

Aluminum

Chromium

Tungsten

Steel

Iron

Lead

Silicon

Copper

Bismuth

Platinum

Nickel

Silver

Gold

Zirconium

Hafnium

Strontium

Different “vaccines” contained different metals:

Some metallic particles made of Tungsten or stainless steel were also identified. Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium, Strontium and Aluminum (Vivotif, Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron (Priorix, Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium (Meningetec); Gold or Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron, Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth (Gardasil) or Cerium (Agrippal S1) were also found. The only Tungsten appears in 8/44 vaccines, while Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in 25/44. The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria. As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a nano-bio-interaction occurs and a “protein corona” is formed. The nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body.

This looks very similar to the C19 nanoparticles found in the German Workgroup analysis that I linked above:

When looking at the side effect profile of many other so called “vaccines” we see quite similar adverse effects as we do with the C19 platform. We know that the C19 shots have higher adverse event rates as any other “vaccine” in prior history, however the correlation of adverse effects is comparable. The authors of the study discuss:

The notice of Tripedia DTaP by Sanofi Pasteur reports “Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathia, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea”. The epidemiological studies carried out did not show clear evidence of those associations, even if in 2011 the National Academy of Medicine (formerly, IOM) admitted: “Vaccines are not free from side effects, or adverse effects”. Specific research on components of the vaccines like adjuvants (in most instances, Aluminum salts) are already indicated as possible responsible of neurological symptoms and in some cases, in-vivo tests and epidemiological studies demonstrated a possible correlation with neurological diseases.

 Neurological damages induced in patients under hemodialysis treated with water containing Aluminum are reported in   worldwide-adopted vaccines against Human Papillomavirus (HPV), the debate was reawaken due to some adverse effects reported by some young subjects. Specific studies communicated the existence of symptoms related to never-described-before syndromes developed after the vaccine was administered. For instance, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). The side-effects that can arise within a relatively short time can be local or systemic. Pain at the site of injection, swelling and uncontrollable movement of the hands (though this last symptom can also be considered systemic) are described. Among the systemic effects, fever, headache, irritability, epileptic seizures, temporary speech loss, lower limbs dysaesthesia and paresis, hot flashes, sleep disorders, hypersensitivity reactions, muscle pain, recurrent syncope, constant hunger, significant gait impairment, incapacity to maintain the orthostatic posture are reported.

This graphic video of sudden neurological symptoms, convulsions and death that has been found all over the world since the rollout of the C19 injections.

Warning Graphic Images Global Depopulation in full swing as adult death syndrome

Because of the dangerous labelling of people who question vaccines as “anti-vaxxers”, public discussions particularly in the medical field about “vaccine adverse effects” are rare. But if this is a toxic phenomenon, that could be associated with a dose dependent response against toxic metals, why would we not discuss it? It has no correlation with the term vaccine against whatever infectious agent of concern, but the concern about toxic poisoning effects of metals injected repeatedly into human beings. We know that heavy metals have synergistic toxic effects, and they are poisons. It is interesting that every “vaccine” adverse effects like Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, chronic fatigue and neurological symptoms and many others mentioned above can be direct symptoms of metal toxicity.

Here is a newspaper article about the similarities of neurological symptoms after C19 injections and HPV shots:

Viral video shows woman struggling to walk after her Covid jab in extremely rare case

Dr. Paul Thomas, an Oregon Pediatrician who had his license revoked for voicing his concerns about childhood vaccines toxicity has also been speaking about Aluminum and Mercury toxic adjuvants in the shots.

https://www.paulthomasmd.com/aluminum-in-vaccines.html

Summary:

We are witnessing unprecedented adverse effects of C19 shots which have been found to contain toxic heavy metals. This study shows that all other tested “vaccines” also have been found to contain different combinations of toxic metals. Is the dose and composition of metal combinations affecting the toxic phenomena of debilitating C19 shot injury we are witnessing? Therefore, should the detoxification of metals with EDTA chelation be standard of care as I have discussed in previous articles? Furthermore, is the fact that metals have been found in chemtrails, processed foods including baby formula add to the environmental bioaccumulation in the individual body and thereby affect adverse effects of different shots for the unique individual? Would therefore high toxic body burden of heavy metals and low nutritional supplementation with chelators like Vitamin C, NAC and Glutathione be additionally affecting severity of symptoms?

Why do we allow injections that contain poisonous metals? To call someone an anti-vaxxer who asks this question is pure lunacy, for the question is one of poisonous effects, not supposed vaccination against a pathogen. Why exactly have physicians been suppressed and their license taken away who have spoken out against “vaccines” and their adjuvant toxicity? And why are mainstream physicians so silent on the subject of self-assembly metal nanostructures in C19 injected people?

Why is there such overlap of C19 vax injury and symptoms of heavy metal poisoning?

Signs and Symptoms of Heavy Metal Toxicity in your body. Image Source: topnaturalremedy.com

If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, looks like a duck, could it be that there might be a scientific correlation with it being a duck? In other words, if it looks like metal poison, presents like metal poison, we see metals poisons in the vials and we see metal poisons in the blood of the injected could there be a scientific correlation to metal poisoning being a part of the picture? It seems like it might be worth while adding metal detoxification into all vax injury protocols.

Likes: 45 | Comments: 9 | Reposts: 0 | Share Options: Copy Link

Comments